(January 6, 2014 at 9:10 am)Esquilax Wrote: No, I'm saying that if "intuitional science" is a science then it produces hypotheses and testable predictions that lead to applications in the real world, which is something I'd imagine you'd be all to happy to explain to us, if there actually were any.
When you say..........IN THE REAL WORLD.........you mean in this physical world, right?
Yoga is the connection between this physical world and the REAL world which is not this physical world.
You may well see and measure progress physically and mentally speaking but this is not what yoga aim to really.
As far as physical science at the moment can not measure the progress made to reduce the distance that separate a human from God then it is very hard to talk about verifiable evidence but you never know maybe it will be invented a machine able to see how far is the destination.

Quote:But this is like the fourth time I've asked you this question, and it's the fourth time you've dodged it rather than providing an answer: at what point do we determine that your remarkable evasiveness is just down to the fact that you're simply making stuff up to legitimize the irrational prism through which you interpret the world, as though simply drawing the word science on your bullshit with crayon makes it reputable. Now, can you produce any real results that intuitional science has produced, or not?
I can not walk on the water nor i can levitate but this is not what yoga is all about so i don't really care about it.
What i care is to reduce the distance that separate me from the ocean of cosmic consciousness and this is a personal thing.
As far as you would tell me to mind my own business if i would ask you to give evidence about your relationship why are you asking about result that intuitional science has produced?
The only way to find this out is to engage in this science instead to pretend to see result from other people.

Quote:You would first need to establish that there is something outside of physicality that science is failing to detect, which is another thing you've been asked multiple times, and another question you've dodged without providing anything. You understand that you look like a conman or a fool, right?
To understand anything you got to have the right tools.
Since when physical science has got the right tools to understand what is behind his borders?

Quote:Have you established that consciousness is anything more than the emergent property of the brain that the current evidence shows it to be? No? Then stop putting the cart before the horse, moron.
What is the brain?
Have you got a clue?
If you can demonstrate to me that the brain is more then a storage of information then i will cover you in 24 carat gold.
And if you can demonstrate to me that brain and consciousness are the same things then i will make you a king.
Again i will wait until next Christmas for your evidence.
