(January 8, 2014 at 4:25 pm)ChadWooters Wrote: ... the scientific method, by virtue of its self-imposed limitation, cannot inquire into the cause or experiential character of mental properties. Nor can scientific findings, like evolutionary processes, be used to support any moral philosophy.Much of what you said is correct, but not the above statement. Science can and does study subjective wellbeing (i.e. feelings) both by observation and by survey. Over time, science will increasingly be able to say what, generally speaking, are the conditions for happiness for an average human being. And those scientific findings definitely will be used in support of moral philosophy. But that said, no amount of scientific information, or moral philosophy derived thereof, can make such a philosophy desirable for you - especially if you're not an average individual.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 4, 2024, 4:17 pm
Thread Rating:
The Category Error of Scientism
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
On whether the Word made flesh is a category mistake | LinuxGal | 2 | 614 |
November 17, 2022 at 12:27 am Last Post: Belacqua |
|
The Mathematical Error of Prevailing Selfishness | Duty | 36 | 3959 |
September 29, 2021 at 7:33 pm Last Post: vulcanlogician |
Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)