The Category Error of Scientism

[Neo-Scholastic]

That made about as much sense as post-modernism.

Then you do not understand post-modernism.

---

What? Is this just nitpicking about the language science uses?

Not at all. Just because everyday language is convenient does not mean it reflects the underlying reality of what we describe. The problem is that some AF members seem incapable or unwilling to distinguish between the two distinct categories of being: mental and physical.

---

More proof that you don't know your ass from a hole in the ground!

Changing your user name doesn't make you any less of a cunt.

---

....Nor can scientific findings, like evolutionary processes, be used to support any moral philosophy.

...scientific findings definitely will be used in support of moral philosophy. But that said, no amount of scientific information, or moral philosophy derived thereof, can make such a philosophy desirable for you...

I agree. Science can, and should, inform our decisions. I used the word 'support' in the sense that it cannot serve as the foundation for a moral system.