(January 8, 2014 at 9:44 pm)ChadWooters Wrote:(January 8, 2014 at 8:33 pm)pineapplebunnybounce Wrote: What? Is this just nitpicking about the language science uses?Not at all. Just because everyday language is convenient does not mean it reflects the underlying reality of what we describe. The problem is that some AF members seem incapable or unwilling to distinguish between the two distinct categories of being: mental and physical.
What do you mean by that? I'd need an example to really understand what you mean. What do you mean categories of being? First you'd have to define "being". And then state what your criteria is for categorizing things. What properties are you looking at?