Kind of on the spot, and sort of inspired by another argument I made a little while back, namely this one:
So basically, the inspired argument goes something like this:
P1) To be absolute is to not exist in relation to anything else.
P2) If God exists, he exists in relation to his creation. [Both in terms of the properties he possesses (i.e his omnipotence vs. our impotence) and in terms of his wanting us to have a personal relationship with him]
C) Therefore, if God exists he cannot be absolute.
Might be a crap argument, but it came to mind as vaguely interesting.
Platonic-Theodicy Dilemma Wrote:
So basically, the inspired argument goes something like this:
P1) To be absolute is to not exist in relation to anything else.
P2) If God exists, he exists in relation to his creation. [Both in terms of the properties he possesses (i.e his omnipotence vs. our impotence) and in terms of his wanting us to have a personal relationship with him]
C) Therefore, if God exists he cannot be absolute.
Might be a crap argument, but it came to mind as vaguely interesting.