RE: Do You Consider BDSM Immoral?
January 20, 2014 at 2:12 am
(This post was last modified: January 20, 2014 at 2:24 am by Violet.)
(January 13, 2014 at 7:01 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: If it meets the three criteria of Safe, Sane, and Consensual, yes, it is OK. Fail on any of those three legs, and the stool falls over.
Honestly... safe and sane are irrelevant when regarding 'morally acceptable' (from even a moderate perspective).
If all of those involved with a capacity to disagree happen to agree: may they do whatever the hell they like.
(January 19, 2014 at 10:07 pm)Shell B Wrote: You can have off the wall sex without it being BDSM, so why make it sound like people who don't do it are boring?
Instant ramen is good and all, but adding some spice really gives it flavor. It isn't that vanilla can't be (or isn't) fun... it's that it can become somewhat boring to those who are used to a whole lot of spice.
Hell, I would note that 'off the wall sex' is very much the spirit of BDSM... they don't just want sex: they want SEX. The very thought of 'vanilla' is generally more aimed at missionary and doggystyle than it is 'sex using bodies only where all pain is completely unintentional, complete with zero roleplay, zero sensory depravation, and both all parties are considered completely equal in all facets of the lovemaking'.
People just don't tend towards thinking like that
Please give me a home where cloud buffalo roam
Where the dear and the strangers can play
Where sometimes is heard a discouraging word
But the skies are not stormy all day
