(January 21, 2014 at 3:17 pm)StoryBook Wrote: I see so you support animal testing, quite the contradiction there.
Do you really think it is healthy?
All that is in healthy food is chemicals, all that is in unhealthy food is chemicals. If you understand the physiology and chemistry who could
synthesise food from meat that is either. Do you not agree with this? Just because I can imagine set of action in a thought experiment that illustrates my point does not mean that I agree with those actions.
The point is that science can allow the creation of vegan cat food that allows the animals to be healthy.
(January 21, 2014 at 3:17 pm)StoryBook Wrote: We do try to reduced suffering and HAVE. Humans make ethics animals don't have ethics. Animals live and think in the present. They don't dwell on things. Like i said before, there is a difference between abuse and survival. Beating an animal is wrong, killing an animal for nutrients is a fact of life.
So your argument essentially is this
1. We should try to reduce suffering
2. The suffering of animals caused by humans eating animals has no ethical relevance because it happens in nature anyway/ is natural.
Therefore its is ok to eat meat. Is this your argument?
