http://theatheistkilla.blogspot.com/2012...ial.html?m=
I think the best way to argue this one is by using "God of the gaps". Just because we don't YET know how the universe was created doesn't mean it was magic.
How would you refute this guy?
I think the best way to argue this one is by using "God of the gaps". Just because we don't YET know how the universe was created doesn't mean it was magic.
How would you refute this guy?