RE: "Undefeated" Apologetic Argument
January 24, 2014 at 9:19 am
(This post was last modified: January 24, 2014 at 9:20 am by Ben Davis.)
(January 24, 2014 at 9:02 am)ThePinsir Wrote: How would you refute this guy?With lolz.
Quote:P1 - Both ''STE'' and ''SCPNCEU'' are irrational, illogical, and have no evidence.That's right. STE is a known falsehood: space/time began with the expansion of the singularity and no-one with any knowledge holds the position implied by SCPNCEU.
Quote:P2 - If you deny or disbelieve in an ''Uncreated Creator'' option as the cause of the universe, then your only two options are''STE'' and ''SCPNCEU''.Nonsense, false dichotomy. Because STE is a flasehood, it can't be a position of any kind. And since SCPNCEU is a nonsense, in fact, neither of the proposed options are options at all. Pure misdirection.
Quote:P3 - ''Atheists'' deny or disbelieve in an ''Uncreated Creator'' option as the cause of the universe.I do because this is special pleading and a logically incoherent concept. Other atheists may or may not.
Quote:T - ''Atheists'' are irrational, illogical, and have no evidence.This conclusion has nothing to do with the propositions! A generalisation of atheists cannot be achieved from an examination of misunderstandings (or lies) regarding scientific knowledge that may or may not be held by individuals.
Undefeated, pah! School children can see through this nonsense.
Sum ergo sum
