(January 24, 2014 at 9:29 am)enrico Wrote: Atwater being a good and fair researcher take in consideration all point of view that is why she report the point of view of everybody even those who do not agree with NDE seeing God and afterlife.
So your point in showing that there are skeptics means nothing at all.
So in your tallying the evidence, if it's evidence for NDEs meaning something, it counts for something. If it's evidence against it, it counts for nothing. That means you're only counting the positive evidence. Of course if you only count the positive evidence, the evidence will be positive, because you've chosen to only count that positive evidence. Atwater may be a competent person, but you are not. If you are only counting the positive evidence, like you say, then your accounting of the evidence means nothing, because you intentionally excluded the negative evidence for bad reasons.
The negative evidence does mean something. It means there is evidence against NDEs meaning what you say they mean. And since that's the only evidence presented so far, ALL THE EVIDENCE is negative.
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)