I need a volunteer

[Cyberman]

Ah. So you can't name ten. Colour me surprised.

As a detective you would be a total failure.

And as a witness you would be a complete joke. I never claimed to be a detective, but if I were and you kept dancing around after being asked to substantiate your claims, like you are doing right now, I'd have you thrown into the drunk tank before you could say "wasting police time".

What a good detective would do when he can't get 100% solid evidence?
He would try to build up a mosaic that represent some or total evidence with whatever he got.

Only the reliable, relevant evidence. He wouldn't bother trying to cobble together a case based on any old fairy tale that takes his fancy. Not and want to keep his job, anyway.

So piece by piece he would build this mosaic.
Now as i just explain to R.salesman we got these first Christians who were prepared to be eaten alive by beasts in the arena.

Except, of course, that the reliable evidence for such xtians vs wild beast extravaganzas is precisely zero. But you should be used to that by now.

This is a good piece of evidence that show that Jesus was teaching a very strong spirituality capable of overcoming the physical reality.

Ah, the old 'why would they die for a lie' canard. Just to recap:

Early xtians went to their deaths against lions etc in the arena, despite the fact that the evidence shows that no such things happened, therefore everything Jesus said and did is real and true. And this is "good evidence" to you? Wanna buy a bridge?

Also the gospel of Jesus the Christ is a good way to know about Jesus extraordinary things.
Why is that?
Because what is written in this book go hand in hand with what is taught by Shiva, Krishna and many other great personality.

And guess what? It's all totally irrelevant. You made the claim that "thousand of people witness Jesus doing things", whereupon I asked you to name some of them in an attempt to point out that anonymous witnesses in a story from a single source don't qualify as reliable evidence in any sane and rational world, however many of them there may be.

And please stop winking at me; I'm not that desperate.

Again you show that you wouldn't be a good detective.
You came to a quick conclusion thinking that a wink means a certain thing but you find difficult to imagine that to me this wink mean something else.

Again you show that you're a joyless buffoon. I was taking the piss - just about all you've made yourself useful for - but I also wanted to make the point that I find it rather annoying when used as punctuation as you do.

Some people wink to somebody else in order to tell them.....YOU SEE I MAKE YOU FOOL ONCE AGAIN.

Yeah, keep telling yourself that.

But please don't ask me what i mean.

Why, have we reached the stage where even you haven't got a clue what you mean as well?