(January 24, 2014 at 10:41 am)StoryBook Wrote: So, 8 years of chemistry, biochemistry, and organic chemistry, is just basic chemistry? Yea just can't take you seriously now.
That "evidence" you show is not controlled enough to tell me anything. It doesn't say exactly what they ate. Was there even meat in that test. It needs to tell what they are eating and how much. We also need to know if it's organic or not.
Vets do not spend 8 years of chemistry, biochemistry, and organic chemistry. They study some in preclinical years, which in the UK generally comprise the first 3 years intermixed with physiology, pharmacology etc, and they certainly conduct no significant research. They don't even study chemistry or biochemistry to final year undergraduate degree level in those subjects, let alone postgraduate (ie PhD) level.
Regardless, please answer the question, do you agree that all chemicals in meat could in principle be synthesised or derived from non meat sources and used to create a healthy vegan cat food?
So you are willing to dismiss all the evidence that eating meat is bad for ones health, but you are happy to believe organic food is healthier than non-organic based on what evidence?