RE: The Category Error of Scientism
January 24, 2014 at 8:40 pm
(This post was last modified: January 24, 2014 at 8:51 pm by Anomalocaris.)
What wooters is trying to say is the measure of science ought to be whether science would humor the whims of one Chad Wooters.
Since science had 100 years in which to humor wooters, but yet wooters has not been humored, therefore it is obvious that science is stagnant and wrong.
Science must be wrong because the alternative - a self-important baffoon like Wooters, WOOTERS, for sooth, could possibly have been a moron for thinking his whim is worth humoring - is impossible, in wooter's infallible opinion.
Since science had 100 years in which to humor wooters, but yet wooters has not been humored, therefore it is obvious that science is stagnant and wrong.
Science must be wrong because the alternative - a self-important baffoon like Wooters, WOOTERS, for sooth, could possibly have been a moron for thinking his whim is worth humoring - is impossible, in wooter's infallible opinion.