Kind of you to butt in Tav.
No Tav. If you followed this conversation you'd know that WC made a claim that I'm pursuing him for. Yay it's another opportunity for you to vomit your rhetoric. No point dude.. save it to make a point sometime.
Yes fucktard. Go develop a brain and work out some shit.
Transcendental.
do you need pics?
As is your argument too. Exactly so... stalemate.
(March 9, 2010 at 5:09 pm)tavarish Wrote: Shifting the burden of proof! Yay!
No Tav. If you followed this conversation you'd know that WC made a claim that I'm pursuing him for. Yay it's another opportunity for you to vomit your rhetoric. No point dude.. save it to make a point sometime.
(March 9, 2010 at 5:09 pm)tavarish Wrote: Didn't you say that the bible wasn't to be taken literally?
Yes fucktard. Go develop a brain and work out some shit.
(March 9, 2010 at 5:09 pm)tavarish Wrote: Explain God's physical nature please.
Thanks.
Transcendental.
do you need pics?
(March 9, 2010 at 5:09 pm)tavarish Wrote: It is not a rationally sound statement, it is an argument from ignorance.
The argument from personal incredulity, also known as argument from personal belief or argument from personal conviction, refers to an assertion that because one personally finds a premise unlikely or unbelievable, the premise can be assumed to be false, or alternatively that another preferred but unproven premise is true instead.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance
As is your argument too. Exactly so... stalemate.