Mysticism is okay imo because Atheism 2.0 has to allow that some are highly likely to remain religious. This gives the wiggle room for those for whom it would be advantageous to believe for both themselves and others
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 15, 2025, 6:10 pm
Thread Rating:
|
Pegs and holes: In defense of quantum mysticism
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
Pegs and holes: In defense of quantum mysticism - by schrodingerserection - January 24, 2014 at 5:00 am
RE: Pegs and holes: In defense of quantum mysticism - by Ben Davis - January 24, 2014 at 6:48 am
RE: Pegs and holes: In defense of quantum mysticism - by Cato - January 24, 2014 at 6:59 am
RE: Pegs and holes: In defense of quantum mysticism - by Alex K - January 24, 2014 at 9:01 am
RE: Pegs and holes: In defense of quantum mysticism - by Autumnlicious - January 24, 2014 at 1:08 pm
RE: Pegs and holes: In defense of quantum mysticism - by Cinjin - January 27, 2014 at 4:20 am
RE: Pegs and holes: In defense of quantum mysticism - by Odysseus - January 27, 2014 at 6:12 am
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
