RE: The Category Error of Scientism
January 28, 2014 at 2:02 pm
(This post was last modified: January 28, 2014 at 2:03 pm by The Reality Salesman01.)
If I've read this right, and there's a good chance I didn't, it seems like you're saying that descriptions, as they appear to us in consciousness, are evidence of a nonphysical substance? So if I smell something, and my brain processes the sense data, the descriptive state of that "smell" experience that appears in consciousness is now a separate substance that now must be accounted for by means other than the first person experience of an operating physical system? Have I messed this all up? Please clarify any misunderstanding on my part.