RE: So I got in trouble
January 30, 2014 at 2:18 am
(This post was last modified: January 30, 2014 at 2:20 am by Drich.)
(January 30, 2014 at 2:08 am)rasetsu Wrote:(January 30, 2014 at 1:59 am)Drich Wrote:you read the set up, but you didn't read the delivery!
Fight your enemy where she isn't Rase!!!
Your delivery didn't come close either. Explain to me why I was thinking of Derrida. I'll give you a hint. Willard Van Orman Quine.
Got it yet?
Derrida was nothing more than a variable (x) in The greater equation. My goal was to identify the equation and not to solve for (x). The fact that I saw identified and then lead you to tip your hand concerning the "logical trap/the greater equation" was the thought process I correctly identified. (Not nessessarly what you were thinking but how you were thinking) Variables in a person equation can change/are required to change in order for them To maintain their pride. But if one can identify the equation they are trying to use then no matter what variables they plug in one can predict and redirect the out come.
(January 30, 2014 at 2:09 am)rexbeccarox Wrote: Wow, Drich. You're doing a great job of upholding your vows from the OP. Good job.
I haven't called anyone any names.. What are you talking about?
