(March 12, 2010 at 2:14 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: You constantly move the goalpost Tav. Of course I'm not going to bother to answer your inane requests. This is your methodology for ascertaining truth: Blind denial.
Me moving goalposts = asking you to back up your claims with specific details.
I asked you to elaborate on a number of things, you gave me "42". Cute.
I don't deny anything on the basis that I don't want to. I deny claims because of no evidence and lack of an objectively verifiable explanation.
God just is? He has a nature?
Why is that?
How can you know this to be true?
All I EVER hear from you are vague claims and highly impossible scenarios in which the laws of nature don't apply, but you can still discern intention and nature from a being that is not, NOR NEVER CAN BE verified by scientific means. There are many fallacies used in your arguments and yet you ignore them and continue on your path to ridiculous claims.
You blame me of doing the same thing, but you have yet to elaborate on any points that you consider fallacial. Please get used to backing up your points, or stop entertaining claims that you can't back up with reasoned debate.
