RE: Atheists, George Zimmerman and the burden of proof
February 4, 2014 at 5:08 pm
(This post was last modified: February 4, 2014 at 5:14 pm by là bạn điên.)
(February 4, 2014 at 4:58 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Listen, dickhead. If you approve of vigilantes tracking people on the basis of they look "different" and then killing them well you be my guest. I just just dismissed you to the ranks of assholedom.
And further evidence that Minimalist is incapable of any sort of analysis but just resorts to childish insults
Quote:Listen, dickhead.
And baseless supposition.
Quote:If you approve of vigilantes tracking people on the basis of they look "different"
(which I certainly do not )
and then resorts again to childish insults
Quote: just just dismissed you to the ranks of assholedom.
As if I cared what a rather infantile ideologues rates me as.
(February 4, 2014 at 5:05 pm)No_God Wrote: Didn't just get in trouble for pulling a shotgun out on his girlfriend during an argument?
1) Even if he did it has no bearing on this case since it happened post factum and does not prove any part of the case against him. I don't think there is much contention that Zimmerman is rather an odd person with anger management issues but you cannot convict someone of something on the basis that it is possible that that might have happened.
2) In fact the Girlfriend, Samantha Scheibe, has refused to participate in any prosecution and claimed that the detectives involved misunderstood what she had said. She has stated that she is not frightened of Zimmerman and wishes to stay with him in a signed affadavit
Some may call them junk, I call them treasures.
