(February 4, 2014 at 10:31 pm)pineapplebunnybounce Wrote: Actually science functions by having people make hypothesis logically and then checking if they're real. Philosophy stops right before the checking. What's the point? I can certainly make up theories that are logically sound, but if I cannot test it out, it contributes nothing.
Please tell me the scientific experiment you would use to show that if you cannot test something, "it contributes nothing." Or did you just say something that itself contributes nothing? And how would you know? Surely we can test whether what you said contributes something, because if we can't, by your own admission, what you said contributes nothing.
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)