RE: The Bible is the claim, not the evidence
February 8, 2014 at 7:30 pm
(This post was last modified: February 8, 2014 at 7:42 pm by Chas.)
(January 30, 2014 at 3:32 am)orangebox21 Wrote:(January 26, 2014 at 11:15 am)Chas Wrote: Please define 'life'. Are replicating molecules alive?
For the sake of this discussion life would be the moment in the evolutionary process when chemical evolution (abiogenesis) became biological evolution. This is however different than the origin of life.
That seems to be precisely the definition of the origin of life.

Quote:(January 26, 2014 at 11:15 am)Chas Wrote: There was no free oxygen in the atmosphere or the water when life started. None.
Hydrolysis doesn't require free oxygen. Amino acids would not form in water because the moment they did hydrolysis would occur and the amino acid bonds would break.
No, amino acids are not broken down by water. Proteins will break down into constituent amino acids by hydrolysis.
Quote:(January 26, 2014 at 11:15 am)Chas Wrote: The molecular oxygen in our atmosphere and in the oceans is a product of life.
Need a little clarification. Some here are suggesting that life began in water. You are suggesting water was created from life.
No, you seem not to understand what 'molecular oxygen' means. It is free oxygen as O2 and O3, not the oxygen atom in water.
There was no free oxygen before there was life, either in the atmosphere or dissolved in water.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Science is not a subject, but a method.