Any Vegetarians/Vegans here?

[Bad Wolf]

You are very funny boy.
According to atheism the changes came because our species made those changes in the past so we inherit what we are now.

Wrong. Atheism doesn't say that, science says that. Yet again, you show that you don't understand the theory of evolution.

This dogma is as bad as the religious dogmas in which people get the manna from the sky.

This shows that you don't understand the scientific process at all. You see, with scientific theories, they are often changed to account for new evidence. With religious dogmas, nothing is ever changed despite new evidence.

Have you ever got something for free?
Don't tell me the usual bullshit boy.

Oxygen, a newspaper, a lollypop. The list could go on and on.

Are you telling me that we have the same digestive system, the same quantity of hydrochloric acid to break down the meat that we sweat through our tongues that we hunt during the night that we have sharp claws and powerful jaws?
Gee, the last time i looked myself in the mirror i must have seen a monster!

I'm telling you we share similarities. Do you know what that word means? Similarities with both carnivores and herbivores.

Idiot.
Our small incisor and canine teeth are not design to kill and brake the raw meat down........

I didn't say that, idiot.

......like an omnivore.

And I'll say once again enrico, posting pictures and sharing your opinion on them is not evidence. Show me one scientist who agrees with you. Link one peer-reviwed, scientific article that supports what you say. You can't? Oh yea thats right, because no one agrees with you, because you are wrong.

If this is the case that you salivate at the sight of raw meat then you ruin all your natural feeling.
It is like a smoker or a junkie that feel that smoke or drugs are good for him.
It is only when you are free from unnatural way of life that you are able to judge what is good and natural and what is bad.
Unfortunately you f...... up your sense of good and bad.

Once again, I want you to link us to a peer reviewed, scientific article that agrees with what you say.

Eating meat and taking addictive drugs are nowhere near the same thing at all. The effects of drugs such as nicotine and tobbaco on the brain have been well documented. Do some research, look up the pleasure pathway and dopamine receptors. But of course you won't, you are an ignorant fuck with a superiority complex.

Eh, boy why don't you tell me why out of 2000 people with cardiovascular diseases only less of 10 i found to be vegetarians in the last 24 years that i worked in medical situation?

Stop ignoring my replies enrico, we have been over this. Shall I repeat what I said before? Vegetarians are much much much less common than regular people. 10 out of 2000 people (or so you say) is actually not far off being representative. And even if you were right, you would have to prove scientifically that meat was the cause of cardiovascualr disease in these people, something you have completely failed to do. And BTW, i'm pretty sure everybody is sceptical that you work in any proffession to do with medical expertise, unless you work in homeopathy.

The fact that everybody disagree with me doesn't mean a thing.
They also disagree that God exist so what?

Not everybody on this forum disagrees that god exists. But its not just everybody on this forum that disagrees with you. Its every scientist in the world. Science disagrees with you. Now if you think you are right, in order to convince anybody, you are going to have to provide evidence. Maybe conduct your own research, a case study or an experiment maybe? But of course you won't do that, you are far to lazy and stupid to pull anything like that off.

One more point is that when you spew dung your friend will keep quite in order not to humiliate you any further like when you said that in the past omindis or man was probably eating carcasses.

Right, so your evidence that I was wrong about that is that no one corrected me? Right......Do you even think before you type your answers, fucking idiot. I would link you to the right articles that support my point about scavanging carasses, but you wouldn't read it.

How man can have the same acids and digestive system as a hyena or a vulture?
Even a carnivore like a lion can not deal rotten meat.

You misunderstand me. I didn't say 'rotten meat' I said a 'carcass'. As you would know if you actually researched anything you talked about, meat can keep for at least a day in the right conditions and it has been theorized that early man would scavange on the kills of other predators.

This is the perfect comparison.
The fact that you find difficult to DIGEST this analogy it means only that you lost your natural way of judging. (as i already mention above.

And as I have already said, you have absoltely no evidence for your 'hypothesis' which means, I and everybody else, are going to dismiss it.

The quantity and the quality as well.
If you try to tell your rotten ideas to someone expert in medicine you would be lucky if they don't spit in your face and kick you out their environ.

My rotten ideas? Enrico, i'm curious. Have you ever talked to a real doctor? Or a biologist? Have you ever told them what you believe? And if so, did you actually listen to what they said?

In his book The Origin of Man he tells us:
"Although we know nothing for certain about the time or place that man shed the thick hair that covered him, with much probability of being right we could say that he must have lived in a warm country where conditions were favourable to the frugivorous way of life which, to judge from analogies, must have been the way man lived."

Ah, I see how you could misinterpet that. It comes down to (once again) your fundamental misunderstanding of the theory of evolution. This 'man' that Darwin is talking about, is not a homosapien. It isn't a human being. There were plenty of hairless apes, different species and subspecies. In order for you to be right, you're going to have to prove that darwin was talking about homosapiens. And at any rate, whether we evolved from herbivores is irrelevant, we are arguing over the fact that humans today are omnivores. And even if darwin actually meant what you are saying, so what? He lived hundreds of years ago. Science and knowledge have increased since then.

Get lost little ignorant prick.
You show me the evidence that man body-mind is build to be omnivore i i will cover you in pure gold.

So i'm guessing you completely ignored me when I told you exactly where to find the evidence. Remember when i told you to look on google scholar? Did you do that? I don't think you did.
I'm not going to link anything here because that would be way too much work for me but i will tell you where to look. Go on google scholar, and read the articles about teeth in animals, also research digestive systems of carnivores, herbivores and omnivores.
This is such a well documented area of biology with a countless amount of evidence to support it, you are going to need a lot of gold. Good luck, not that I expect you to do any of what I just suggested....

---

There has never been a time....at any point in recorded history......in which people have not been picking their nose so what?
Does this mean that it is natural to pick the nose or eating meat?

Yea, pretty much

People who eat meat don't give a damn about morality.

I guess thats why 6 billion people are all killing, raping and stealing......oh wait.

Mad cow disease is not natural.

And how did you come to that conclusion?

Your guessing has no real foundation.

Except that one little annoying thing that you don't like: science.