(February 14, 2014 at 6:53 pm)Alex K Wrote:(February 14, 2014 at 6:29 pm)jideoni charles Wrote: Where you don't deny there is a nuance of intelligence back of your actions, e.g. formulation of certain rules, then those superior natural laws must be backed and fronted, topped and downed by a commensurate superior intelligence too
Say what? That is an English sentence in grammar at best. A nuance of intelligence back of my actions. What the hell?
I mean a shade, a halo, a puff, a breath or something not totally deniable as having a light suggestion of intelligence.
In other words, intelligence per se, no matter its littleness or bigness.
Or like the positive presence of water as a component of blood, even if not discretely perceptible.
Every action you take must necessarily be the product of your intelligence or that of another.