Atheism Destroyed By Fire (Of Proof) I

[Whateverist]

Many arguments have been put up for proving the existence of God - especially the 'design-designer' argument.

On the other hand, at the base of the numerous arguments against the existence of God is the incompatibility of the omnipotence of God with His benevolence i.e. if there is God, the God must be all-powerful and good;

Has any one pointed out to you that atheism does not depend on any argument against the existence of gods? It is the theist that argues not just to make a positive claim, but to make a highly dubious one. Why would you think an analysis of arguments made against the possibility of the existence of god would undermine atheism?

I am very disappoint.