RE: An unanswerable question
February 22, 2014 at 5:33 pm
(This post was last modified: February 22, 2014 at 5:36 pm by Lek.)
(February 22, 2014 at 3:03 pm)truthBtold Wrote:(February 22, 2014 at 2:57 pm)Lek Wrote: Yes.
Not a good example to follow.. and numbers 6 says it has to be completed
whats ur take on paul?
.
Paul was right in saying there was no need for animal sacrifices anymore. It was a requirement for the Jewish nation up until the crucifiction of Christ. Paul met with Christ on the road to Damascus and was led to spread the faith to the gentiles. His views didn't conflict with the other apostles teachings and was himself a genuine apostle. He was already a pharisee, a position of high honor in Jewish society, with a brilliant future ahead of him. Why would he go around preaching christianity knowing it would lead to the beatings and stonings he received? I don't see any basis for the conjecture I see here concerning Paul. It's just opinions used to discredit Paul and christianity.