Self explanatory, really.
(February 26, 2014 at 9:33 am)enrico Wrote: Let me say that i do not refer to farmers that burn their necks in the sun.
I instead refer to people who are opposed to modern ways but most of all they can't see past the end of their own nose.
Take the smokers.
Now (in the western countries) these rednecks are under control but 20-30 years ago they were smoking almost everywhere and if you object to their stench they would talk about their freedom or similar garbage.
That fight has been won but other fights still have to be won.
The meat policy is even more important as the damages that cause are even bigger in quantity.
Just few days ago one poster write..........If you want to eat meat, eat meat. If you don't want to eat meat, don't eat meat........Why is this so fucking difficult for some people? ...........
http://atheistforums.org/thread-23157-page-87.html
Well, as far as this policy wouldn't involve any restriction to my freedom or damage the planet earth then you are welcome.
Unfortunately it does involve both that is why when someone freedom limit other people freedom it is important to stop these rednecks.
The damages done so far from meat eating are more and more clear as the forests disappear and climate change for the worse.
Man was never build up to be omnivore as we can see from the different body (teeth, jaw, length of stomach and different acids to digest food) so by going against nature it is clear that damages will occur.
Considering that so many people agree with the redneck policy it is clear that it will take sometime to put these rednecks inside the corral of insanity but the choices don't give much leeway.
If we want to survive and if we can give our future generation a better world then we have to stop these rednecks as soon as possible.
(February 26, 2014 at 9:43 am)No_God Wrote:
If I were to create self aware beings knowing fully what they would do in their lifetimes, I sure wouldn't create a HELL for the majority of them to live in infinitely! That's not Love, that's sadistic. Therefore a truly loving god does not exist!
Dead wrong. The actions of a finite being measured against an infinite one are infinitesimal and therefore merit infinitesimal punishment.
I say again: No exceptions. Punishment should be equal to the crime, not in excess of it. As soon as the punishment is greater than the crime, the punisher is in the wrong.
Quote:The sin is against an infinite being (God) unforgiven infinitely, therefore the punishment is infinite.
Dead wrong. The actions of a finite being measured against an infinite one are infinitesimal and therefore merit infinitesimal punishment.
Quote:Some people deserve hell.
I say again: No exceptions. Punishment should be equal to the crime, not in excess of it. As soon as the punishment is greater than the crime, the punisher is in the wrong.