(March 25, 2010 at 5:41 am)Saerules Wrote:Seems you're right on that meaning.(March 18, 2010 at 9:01 am)fr0d0 Wrote: I think photographic pornography is always bad. If you share intimacy beyond the boundaries of that intimacy, Isn't that what perversion is? ..taking it too far?Not necessarily... but I agree for the most part. Perversion is simply doing things outside of the norm...
(March 25, 2010 at 5:41 am)Saerules Wrote: It's my opinion that photographic pornography is usually bad... <snip> In fact... it's my opinion that pornography is almost always less than mediocre... with little 'good' porn spaced between utter sludge... and 'excellent' pornography like a little gold mine that one is not guaranteed to find even over an entire night of looking for it. I find myself particularly drawn to people genuinely in pleasure... and I don't often see that, sadly.I guess I must be unlucky in that all the pornography I've seen is less than mediocre. & I've never seen genuine pleasure by participants in porn.
