Please allow me to respond to Tav and SAE, but sorry for Thor I don't have enough time to get that far tonight. I will be back in the morning.
"The total potential payout, therefore, was capped at $4.577 billion for buildings 1, 2, 4, and 5."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Silve...ce_dispute
http://www.justiceblind.com/airplanes.html
Here is a very long list of times aircraft were hijacked and used as weapons, or times when their is a paper trail of people expecting others to hijack and use aircraft as weapons. There was a famous paper in '72, I forget the name, where America considered hijacking a jet and faking flying it over Cuba and blowing it up, pretending Americans had died so they could invade. They knew about the hijacking planes idea long, long ago...
“Hate blogger” Hal Turner’s lawyer said last week, and prosecutors agreed, that Turner was “trained by the FBI on how to be deliberately provocative” and “worked for the FBI from 2002 to 2007 as an ‘agent provocateur’ and was taught by the agency ‘what he could say that wouldn’t be crossing the line.’”
http://www.sfbayview.com/2009/lynching-o...id-by-fbi/
And for the PNAC quote you asked about:
Section V of Rebuilding America's Defenses, entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force", includes the sentence: "Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event––like a new Pearl Harbor"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for..._Harbor.22
That's all the time we have tonight folks. These are easy links to find, instead of name claling try googling things, you just may learn something, or come up with a better rebut.
Sorry I couldn't get to you SAE or Thor, only so many minutes in the day.
Thanks,
-Pip
Quote:Larry, on the other hand, lost millions from the building's collapse, as he had to rebuild, essentially out of pocket.I don't know where you get your information Tav, but he had to pay out of his own pocket? Are you serious? Poor Larry, are you forgetting that he was the recipient of the largest insurance settlement in the history of insurance settlements?
"The total potential payout, therefore, was capped at $4.577 billion for buildings 1, 2, 4, and 5."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Silve...ce_dispute
Quote:So a single bit of false information is somehow proof that the whole thing was a lie?Noooo, but a single bit of false information (with intent, disinformation, lies) would vindicate my point that we are being lied to about 9/11. If there is one lie, than we are being lied to ,are we not? That;s why I have made a claim that cannot be false. Somewhere someone has to be telling at least one little white lie about that day. That is my only claim, I make no assertions about anything else about 9/11 other than the fact that there are lies.
Quote:Again, as I explained above, the attack was unprecedented.Was it?
http://www.justiceblind.com/airplanes.html
Here is a very long list of times aircraft were hijacked and used as weapons, or times when their is a paper trail of people expecting others to hijack and use aircraft as weapons. There was a famous paper in '72, I forget the name, where America considered hijacking a jet and faking flying it over Cuba and blowing it up, pretending Americans had died so they could invade. They knew about the hijacking planes idea long, long ago...
Quote:They simply couldn't act because there was no precedent for it.The planes are also on alert for something akin to enemy bombers, not a goddamn commercial airliner being used as a missile.Except for the part where they knew about the possibility of hijacked domestic airliners as missile weapons. And if they did not, they are neglectful for not knowing an obvious threat.
Quote:Are you insane? This isn't a rhetorical question. This sounds absolutely nuts.Oh, it was Hal Turner.
“Hate blogger” Hal Turner’s lawyer said last week, and prosecutors agreed, that Turner was “trained by the FBI on how to be deliberately provocative” and “worked for the FBI from 2002 to 2007 as an ‘agent provocateur’ and was taught by the agency ‘what he could say that wouldn’t be crossing the line.’”
http://www.sfbayview.com/2009/lynching-o...id-by-fbi/
And for the PNAC quote you asked about:
Section V of Rebuilding America's Defenses, entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force", includes the sentence: "Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event––like a new Pearl Harbor"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for..._Harbor.22
That's all the time we have tonight folks. These are easy links to find, instead of name claling try googling things, you just may learn something, or come up with a better rebut.
Sorry I couldn't get to you SAE or Thor, only so many minutes in the day.
Thanks,
-Pip
