Well, he's right about one thing. There is something in the air. Bullshit.
Meanwhile....
Is. 13
Um..no. Cyrus the Great captured Babylon by coup d'main rather than sacking it he moved in.
http://www.livius.org/ct-cz/cyrus_I/babylon05.html
Oh, and the Babylonians themselves credited Marduk with finding their great redeemer king which is no more fucking absurd than yhwh...but at least in the historical version we don't get these absurd bible claims.
Why do xtians repeatedly fall for such easily refuted horseshit? Are they simply that stupid?
Meanwhile....
Is. 13
Quote:17 Behold, I am stirring up the Medes against them,
who have no regard for silver
and do not delight in gold.
18 Their bows will slaughter[d] the young men;
they will have no mercy on the fruit of the womb;
their eyes will not pity children.
19 And Babylon, the glory of kingdoms,
the splendor and pomp of the Chaldeans,
will be like Sodom and Gomorrah
when God overthrew them.
20 It will never be inhabited
or lived in for all generations;
no Arab will pitch his tent there;
no shepherds will make their flocks lie down there.
21 But wild animals will lie down there,
and their houses will be full of howling creatures;
there ostriches[e] will dwell,
and there wild goats will dance.
22 Hyenas[f] will cry in its towers,
and jackals in the pleasant palaces;
its time is close at hand
and its days will not be prolonged.
Um..no. Cyrus the Great captured Babylon by coup d'main rather than sacking it he moved in.
http://www.livius.org/ct-cz/cyrus_I/babylon05.html
Oh, and the Babylonians themselves credited Marduk with finding their great redeemer king which is no more fucking absurd than yhwh...but at least in the historical version we don't get these absurd bible claims.
Why do xtians repeatedly fall for such easily refuted horseshit? Are they simply that stupid?