(March 4, 2014 at 2:40 pm)JesusLover1 Wrote:(March 4, 2014 at 2:37 pm)Simon Moon Wrote: Here are just some of the hurdles she would have to clear to convince us:
1. Provide demonstrable evidence that she observed something external to herself. That there was a real phenomena to even examine.
2. Provide demonstrable evidence that it did not have a natural explanation.
3. Provide demonstrable evidence that the supernatural exists.
4. Provide demonstrable evidence that angels exist as part of the supernatural.
5. Provide demonstrable evidence that what she saw actually fit the definition of an angel.
Etc, etc...
Until there is some real phenomena that is observable, there is no reason to include the possibility that she saw an angel. There are just too many natural explanations for what she claims she saw.
Or you could just take my word for it and know I have no reason to lie.
Not true.
By your own admission you're here to convert people to your religion.
Many theists will resort to lies to do so.
Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni:
"You did WHAT? With WHO? WHERE???"