(March 4, 2014 at 10:27 am)popeyespappy Wrote: Wrong as usual.
That is funny.
How would you explain the fact that until 50-60 years ago when our grandparents where eating meat once a week (average) they didn't have so many diseases?
Science and medical evidence overwhelmingly shows that the more meat we eat, the sicker we get - heart disease, cancer, diabetes, osteoporosis, and every other major degenerative disease. If eating meat were so natural, it wouldn’t destroy our health.
http://www.powered-by-produce.com/2010/0.../#comments
Quote:The first major evolutionary change in the human diet was the incorporation of meat and marrow from large animals, which occurred by at least 2.6 million years ago.
Opshh, you forget that homo sapiens came much later.
Transformations take time to occur.
If you look at the picture in your link you will find that NON-homo sapiens were trying to get meat from a dead animal.
How the hell would you know that these creature had something in common with homo sapiens?
It is like to say that a child may masturbate but as he grows up he will give up that bad habit.
In other words......forget what hominids were doing 2.6 million years ago and concentrate about what homo sapiens was doing from his early beginning.
Quote:A fragment of a child's skull discovered at Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania, shows the oldest known evidence of anemia caused by a nutritional deficiency, reports a new article. The discovery suggests that early human ancestors began eating meat much earlier in history than previously believed.
Another stupid hypothesis.
There is no evidence that anemia was caused by a lack of meat.
Could be that in those time in that particular place there was lack of green vegies or that boy could have had a malfunction in the body.
When i was a child my mum make me eat meat, despite this i was a bit anemic so your hypothesis is flaw (as usual).