The redneck strike again.

[James2014]

You forgot few important things.
1) The evidence show that the more meat we eat and the more we get sick.

That is true, the evidence does show this, but is irrelevant to the question if we evolved to be able to eat meat.

2) The evidence show that meat in a cold country is not as bad as in a hot country as in a cold county the saturated fat can be used to fight the cold.

What evidence?

3) There is no evidence that we have been evolved to eat meat.
As i just write in the previous post i explained how the mind become slave of the body addiction so you come to think that doing something wrong is not really wrong.

Not only did other early hominids eat meat, as the previous evidence shows, archaeological evidence also shows humans have always eaten meat. For example below is a cave painting of humans hunting! Additionally, we have a significantly shorter bowel length than herbivores which allows us to eat both plants and meat. We also cannot synthesize vitamin B12, and while some animals have bacteria in additional stomach compartments to keep bacteria that produce B12, we do not. We require B12 from our diet which can be obtained either by eating meat or by making supplements. Since humans pre-20th century could not make B12 supplements they must have obtained it from meat.


http://www.venamicasa.com/cultural-activ...n-cave-art

Religions have nothing to do with intuitional science.
All they do is following dogmas or false truth so what they think or do means absolutely nothing.

These religious people claim to be able to practice various forms of intuitional science to be able to perceive some fundamental truth. So it most certainly does have something to do with religion.

We all have something good and something bad.
Physical science is no exception.

You can't just pick and choose when to apply scientific principles because it undermines the strength of your argument. All you do is make a claim and then completely fail to address any counter argument other than by either appealing to some completely untestable nonsensical "intuitional science", or to attack the people making those arguments by saying they are addicted to meat eating. I think meat eating is morally wrong, unhealthy, and damaging to the environment. It is however something we have evolved to be able to do. BUT whether we evolved to be able to do something is completely irrelevant to whether we should do something or not, and by making idiotic arguments you merely make vegans look crazy and irrational. You merely making it easier for meat eaters to justify their behaviour, and you are therefore causing more animals to be murdered.