Ok I admit it

[Esquilax]

I keep skipping over it because whenever I address it you come back with the retort that what I've said has no physical representation. That's been your only objection. You refuse to let go of your safety blanket.

I think you're misunderstanding me: regardless of whatever else goes into your rationale here, there has to be something extant that prompted your chain of thought to begin with. An observation about the world that you start from. Thoughts don't happen in a matterless vacuum, after all. Presuppositions do, but justified trains of thought don't.

I'm not asking for physical evidence here, I'm asking you to deliver your chain of premises and conclusions from the initial observation all the way to your final conclusion that god exists.