Hi, as a hard scientist I have absolutely 0 confidence in the snake oil of the entire field. I am not alone, the DSM is no longer accepted as evidence in many courts, as being unreliable pseudoscience. If courts and lawyers (not exactly rocket surgeons
think it is BS, imagine how bad it really must be. There is only 1 test the MMPI that has had any statistically valid, but perhaps not scientifically valid study. There is absolutely 0 probability that the test you took is scientifically valid and not just a self promotion tool by a crooked snake oil salesman to sell his own services. Run, don't walk, away. If you have problems address them directly, at the source, such as interpersonal problems become better at relating to people, substance addiction, stop using, economic, be more greedy and seek additional options, etc. The simplest and direct answer is usually valid, don't believe bs that is sold to you any more than religion. If this is related to legal troubles search under google for Doubert test or Doubert hearing for the applicable federal law establishing most of this as legally unreliable.
think it is BS, imagine how bad it really must be. There is only 1 test the MMPI that has had any statistically valid, but perhaps not scientifically valid study. There is absolutely 0 probability that the test you took is scientifically valid and not just a self promotion tool by a crooked snake oil salesman to sell his own services. Run, don't walk, away. If you have problems address them directly, at the source, such as interpersonal problems become better at relating to people, substance addiction, stop using, economic, be more greedy and seek additional options, etc. The simplest and direct answer is usually valid, don't believe bs that is sold to you any more than religion. If this is related to legal troubles search under google for Doubert test or Doubert hearing for the applicable federal law establishing most of this as legally unreliable.
