Ok I admit it

[Mudhammam]

There is no point in proving something for which there is evidence, because the proof of it is self evident. We only need to prove what we don't know. Nor what we do know.

You mean that UFOs regular visit Earth and toy with people's minds? You mean that Joseph Smith saw a vision and received the words of God on golden plates? You mean that there is one God and his name is Allah? These are all self-evident too, to the people who believe them, that is. I'm sure you haven't even entertained these notions for one second, that you're possibly missing out on the "truths" and "hope" they have to share. So why should we care about your egocentric experience of God anymore than the UFO abductee who has nothing more to offer but incredible personal testimony and very little rational/critical thought in anything he says?

It depends what you call evidence.

Is it universal? Can anyone test the hypothesis under the same experimental conditions? Can you detect it with your senses? If so, how? I'd like to know so I can test your "experiential evidence."