(March 11, 2014 at 11:20 am)Revelation777 Wrote: How can you say as a matter of fact that there was no miracles back then? I gave the question as a hypothetical as if there were indeed true miracles how you would of responded to Him.How can you say that there were miracles back then? The wording of the first post in the thread didn't act like you were treating the miracles as a hypothetical. You acted like they were an assumption. They're not.
You're pretty much asking, "If there was proof of God's existence, would you believe in God's existence?" This isn't a yes or no question. It's a loaded question with only one correct answer. And until there is such proof, either for God's existence or that there were true miracles 2000 years ago, then the question of how to treat that proof isn't even worth discussing.
That's MISTER Godless Vegetarian Tree Hugging Hippie Liberal to you.
