Totally NOT a debate about the veracity of the gospels

[discipulus]

*face palm*
An incredible display of ignorance regarding the difference between the scientific method and the apologist's narrow (mis)understanding of the historical method.

You too are perilously close to an ad hominem.

This is to be expected.

My friend, I am well aware of what the scientific method is as well as historiography.

But since none of what you wrote in any way undercuts or rebuts my statement, which is a statement of fact i.e. that people defend the pursuits of science, it can be dismissed.

In fact, I can be charitable and agree for the sake of your argument that Christian apologists (I assume you mean this when using the word "apologist") are ignorant narrow minded imbeciles.

I would ask:

So what? How does that rebut or undercut my statement that people defend the pursuits of science?

It does'nt.

It is a red herring.

**********************

***Yawn****

Ehh.....well my friends, I am about to get in the shower.....toodles for now.....