RE: Richard Dawkin's big blunder
March 14, 2014 at 12:04 pm
(This post was last modified: March 14, 2014 at 12:08 pm by Heywood.)
(March 14, 2014 at 11:46 am)Alex K Wrote: No I'm pretty sure that's not what Dawkins means by blindness. You just made that up.
No, I gave you a rationale why I thought that. However when you quote me, you conveniently leave that reason out.
I'll restate for I think the third time....maybe third time will be the charm and you will stop ignoring it. I think Dawkins means by "blindness" that natural evolution isn't guided by anything. I think this because he gives an accurate demonstration of how evolution works and calls it a cheat because his demonstration is clearly guided.
(March 14, 2014 at 11:58 am)Faith No More Wrote:(March 14, 2014 at 11:55 am)Heywood Wrote: Evolution, as a means of creation, is set it and forget it. It isn't guided by God on a constant basis. If that is what you are implying I said, your making a straw man argument.
I'm not even sure how this is a response to what I said.
I'm starting to think that all this is just flying over your head.
That's okay.
I think the stuff I am saying to you is flying over your head too...and that you're being incredulous. But that is the way these discussions go.
I might be missing what you are saying because I am responding to 5 or 6 people so you don't have my complete attention.