What I want to know is how this is evidence of the supernatural?
You say that the skeptic could say that these claims didn't happen that way or they could realize that they can be interpreted correctly they can just be misunderstood by some because of the different perspectives? Have I understood you correctly there?
The thing is though, the skeptic could also say the claims didn't happen at all. Or some of the claims at least.
You say that the skeptic could say that these claims didn't happen that way or they could realize that they can be interpreted correctly they can just be misunderstood by some because of the different perspectives? Have I understood you correctly there?
The thing is though, the skeptic could also say the claims didn't happen at all. Or some of the claims at least.