RE: Tourettes
December 14, 2008 at 11:14 pm
(This post was last modified: December 14, 2008 at 11:19 pm by Daystar.)
(December 14, 2008 at 9:30 pm)EvidenceVsFaith Wrote: Are you sure about that? You'd buy into the whole canopy thing even if you didn't believe the bible was truth?
I didn't say that. I said that I would consider the Bible relevant when discussing things in the Bible whether or not I believed the Bible to be true. Just as if I were discussing Buddhism I would find Gautama or Buddhist text important when considering Buddhism. Or Richard Dawkins when considering Atheism.
[giggles insesantly at an upper case A in Atheism]
(December 14, 2008 at 9:30 pm)EvidenceVsFaith Wrote: Lol funny. Of course non-belief is not a belief! Its absence of a belief! You don't choose belief and you don't choose non-belief! Belief is not a matter of policy. Non-belief is not a belief! Its the opposite. If I don't believe then I don't believe do I? Don't believe doesn't=believe.
I think that you mentioned that before and I was remiss in responding to it. Is belief a matter of policy. I have never considered it as such, meaning I have never given it consideration, but I suppose that it is. You choose belief. You form it based upon a variety of influences, from traditional to cultural, factual and spiritual. I also disagree that non belief isn't a belief. If you believe that there is most likely no gods that is a belief you have chosen regardless of your . . . evidence.
(December 14, 2008 at 9:30 pm)EvidenceVsFaith Wrote: P.S: What is all this 400 about?