(April 5, 2010 at 12:56 pm)RedFish Wrote: ''Religion tells you what to believe, science tells you what it's found. Religion demands that you follow by their rules or else, science demands nothing of you. It offers you free knowledge. This is why I trust science and not religion.''
Science demands data, does it not? Your 'rules'? I don't claim any 'religion', that is your false assertion.
''A closed mind is like a closed book, merely a block of wood.'' If you look for the evidence for Love, you will find it. Demanding data is the domain of machines. I look with my own eyes, and feel with my own heart. Not wikipedia.
Quote:Your 'rules'? I don't claim any 'religion', that is your false assertion.Huh? Where you going with this?
Quote:If you look for the evidence for Love, you will find it.I already have.
Quote:Demanding data is the domain of machines.If you can only claim but cannot provide data and evidence then why should I take any of it seriously? I want knowledge so to understand more but without any infomation/data I cannot. My heart will not give me data nor knowledge.
Quote:feel with my own heart.If that is good enough for you then that's ok. Whatever floats your boat. I on the other hand wish to look far deeper than personal feelings ever could. Because only in movies do feelings go far but not in reality.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence - Carl Sagan
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
