(March 19, 2014 at 7:09 pm)tor Wrote:(March 19, 2014 at 7:06 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: You prove to us how something which by definition is not provable should be provable. Then we can stop thinking that you're being an idiot.
I'm not trying to prove that something which is unprovable is provable.
What I am saying is that you should not believe that something exists if it is indistinguishable from something that does not exist(which means that you had no contact with it personally and have no evidence to back it up).
You're not trying to prove it you're demanding illogical evidence.
Again, what kind of proof would you accept?
