YOU!

[Purple Rabbit]

Of the supernatural? Where exactly? That was my question.

Not of the supernatural, though it was mistaken as being supernatural by Dan Barker. A closer look at the original language demonstrated that Mr. Barker was incorrect in assuming that there were walking dead mentioned in Matthew, when in fact it was only a case of some corpses being thrown from their tombs. And an earthquake turned out to be the trembling of the earth at the moving of a large stone.

So we have bible stories with different interpretations:
- One interpretation is that actual mircales were performed
- Antoher interpretation claims that no miracles were performed
How can the repudiation of any of those interpretations demonstrate truth of the bible. It only demonstrates that bible interpretation yields ambiguous results, thereby making a case for scepticism regarding any interpretation.