but that's just it ; and no convincing by way of the simplest posed argument ever seems accredited to more than the science in empirical knowledge by what Peter was questioned about which occurs continuing to build : What ever side one believes -to not- or believe there is one answer to (source as it is) recorded Jesus/Yeshua asking "Who do YOU say that I am?"
About all the history in a range to about to other's doubting's of historical “records sources" to back to believers stating "the word is the power of God unto salvation"
all that , in that range, if it were
seems
Ehrman has more than a couple boo-boos:
https://www.google.com/search?q=ehrman%2...s&ie=UTF-8
then I searched one I have read since 1976…
seems a bit more scholarly by any comparison:
https://www.google.com/search?q=derek+pr...h&ie=UTF-8
still will only come down to how the recorded Jesus' Q is answered... not apologetic's, anyways...
About all the history in a range to about to other's doubting's of historical “records sources" to back to believers stating "the word is the power of God unto salvation"
all that , in that range, if it were
seems
Ehrman has more than a couple boo-boos:
https://www.google.com/search?q=ehrman%2...s&ie=UTF-8
then I searched one I have read since 1976…
seems a bit more scholarly by any comparison:
https://www.google.com/search?q=derek+pr...h&ie=UTF-8
still will only come down to how the recorded Jesus' Q is answered... not apologetic's, anyways...