Richard Dawkin's big blunder

[Mudhammam]

I don't think anybody would argue that point. Humans are very remarkable in many ways. But it's what you want to say beyond that, that causality implies teleology, that more is needed to explain evolution beyond physical laws acting on physical objects; that is what I find grossly unjustified in light of the data.

I have never said anything beyond pointing out that intellects can design a fitness paradigm and let evolution produce an intended form. Humans are doing that today. The reason humans can do this is because evolution is not a blind process as suggested by Dawkins.

You're misunderstanding Dawkins' point. Evolution is blind in that nature doesn't foresee the effects that physical laws have... At least that is until consciousness emerges.