(March 25, 2014 at 10:49 pm)MindForgedManacle Wrote:I'm not so sure about this. Rational thought is valid by definition IN THE CONTEXT of ideas which are validated by rational thought. There's a dangerous self-reference there that shouldn't be dismissed so readily.(March 25, 2014 at 6:04 pm)ChadWooters Wrote: 3) the validity of rational thought3) This is a can of worms I didn't expect from you. :o You're not a presuppositionalist, are you?
Rational thought is valid by definition. By 'rational thought', we means a means of argumentation that follows what we consider correct structure and inference rules. The acceptance of the 'validity' of rational thought is an axiom. One can [try and] reject it, but no one will take you seriously.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 21, 2025, 5:01 am
Thread Rating:
Panentheism and Brute Facts
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
How we determine facts. | Heywood | 64 | 14001 |
January 8, 2015 at 9:55 pm Last Post: The Grand Nudger |
|
Good, Evil and Panentheism | Neo-Scholastic | 9 | 8426 |
March 31, 2012 at 8:29 pm Last Post: genkaus |
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)