(March 27, 2014 at 6:55 am)Heywood Wrote:(March 27, 2014 at 6:36 am)Jacob(smooth) Wrote: Actually, I'm seeing if you conflate a and B, with C And D. Where C and d are actively killing and failing to protect a fetus
So to be clear, I YO
We DO have a moral duty to go out of our way to protect the child once born, but NOT before its born.
And actively destroying the child is wrong either before or after birth.
Is that what you're saying?
There is a moral obligation to take reasonable care of the unborn.
Don't be so "upidy!" We are animals, a heard of evolved beasts. Any "morals" or "social obligations" we have are simply innate and non-innate evolutionary conditionings that best protects the herd.
The "herd" or "human societal interests" are best served by establishing female equality and autonomy.
Find the cure for Fundementia!