Why is evolution hiding?

[Mister Agenda]

It would make sense that 97% of Scientists believe Evolution to be true because evolution is true.

If evolution is true, it implies that life isn't designed. Evolution explains the diversity of life without requiring any designer but natural selection acting on random variations.

Actually, there is plenty evidence for a designer. Scientists have confirmed that there are people of various Religions who have worked miracles.

I don't think what you mean by 'Scientists have confirmed' is what people who understand science mean by it.

Very seldom does it happen and few people will witness it. I'd say what happened at Fatima Portugal, the Guadalupe tilma, and the medical findings at Lourdes and eslewhere are evidence.

Are you talking about the 'miracle of the sun' at Fatima? Do you know what happens when you stare at the sun to long? Your brain, desperately trying to save your sight from the idiocy in some other part of the brain trys to keep you from looking directly at the sun, causing your eyes to move around involuntarily. When your eyes move involuntarily, it seems like it's the thing you're looking at which moves. Try moving your eye a little bit with your fingertip (through your eyelid) to see this for yourself.

The Marian eyes fall under the category of pareidolia.

The number of 'recognized cures' per year at Lourdes goes down as our knowledge of medicine goes up, what is it, 4 in the last thirty years? Considering how many millions of people go there hoping for a cure, is that rate better than mysterious spontaneous recoveries that seem to be entirely random for people that DON'T go to Lourdes?

The beauty of creation.

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, isn't it?

The Earth's size and corresponding gravity holds a thin layer of mostly nitrogen and oxygen gases, only extending about 50 miles above the Earth's surface. If Earth were smaller, an atmosphere would be impossible, like the planet Mercury. If Earth were larger, its atmosphere would contain free hydrogen, like Jupiter.

What do you think would be a reasonable estimate of the number of planets with sufficient mass to hold an atmosphere like ours without being big enough to hold much free hydrogen in our galaxy?

The Earth is located the right distance from the sun. Much closer or further away and we'd freeze or burn.

The earth's distance from the sun varies by 3.5 million miles every year.

our moon is the perfect size and distance from the Earth for its gravitational pull.

The moon's orbit is also eliptical and ranges about 30,000 miles every two weeks. It's average distance from the earth is currently increasing by about 4 centimeters a year, eventually it will fly away from us. It averaged about 5,000 miles closer when the dinosaurs appeared.

Also, when I bite into a strawberry it seems like that strawberry was designed to delight tastebuds.

Touche'. The strawberry is a hybrid first grown in the 1750s, so it was designed by artificial selection to delight tastebuds.

THe problem I have is that tor said is that DNA proves that our grandparents way back were single cell organism. DNA PROVES no such thing. Scientific theory is not proof so I wish people wouldn't state it like it is and then considering people uneducated idiots if they disagree.

The very first definition of 'theory' that you posted is the one that applies here:

1.a coherent group of tested general propositions, commonly regarded as correct, that can be used as principles of explanation and prediction for a class of phenomena: Einstein's theory of relativity. Synonyms: principle, law, doctrine.

---

Some interpretations of Evolution are not fact and have never been proven by scientific method is what I'm saying.

To which interpretations of religion are you referring?

---

You're not anti-Christian you're anti-stupid?

Tell me, is it not stupid to say that DNA PROVES the great great great X10,000,000 Grandpa of everyone was an Amoebea?

'Proofs' are for math and whiskey. Science does not deal in 'proof', it deals in evidence. How is the similarity of human and amoeba DNA not evidence of common descent? And DNA is only one line of evidence that indicates common descent.