Macro/micro evolution was made up by creationists was it not? And so, hence, it should never be addressed with seriousness until they are corrected of this fact. So-called 'macro' evolution is merely so called 'micro' evolution over a huge timescale.
You get creationists saiyng that they'll happily believe in 'micro' evolution meaning evolution within a species, but they do not believe that a chimpanzee will ever give birth to a human for instance (as it of course won't!!, that's not how evolution works.). This so-called 'macro' evolution they speak of is of course impossible and utterly ridiculous, there is really only 'micro' over long periods of time. But neither so-called 'micro' or 'macro' evolution should be addressed with any seriousness because creationists are fucking confusing things with their made up redefining bullshit (See also: Creationists who say evolution is "only a theory" (wrongly confusing the colloquial sense of 'theory' with the scientific sense)) - right?
EvF
You get creationists saiyng that they'll happily believe in 'micro' evolution meaning evolution within a species, but they do not believe that a chimpanzee will ever give birth to a human for instance (as it of course won't!!, that's not how evolution works.). This so-called 'macro' evolution they speak of is of course impossible and utterly ridiculous, there is really only 'micro' over long periods of time. But neither so-called 'micro' or 'macro' evolution should be addressed with any seriousness because creationists are fucking confusing things with their made up redefining bullshit (See also: Creationists who say evolution is "only a theory" (wrongly confusing the colloquial sense of 'theory' with the scientific sense)) - right?
EvF
