The redneck strike again.
April 4, 2014 at 10:32 am
(This post was last modified: April 4, 2014 at 10:39 am by Rampant.A.I..)
I think it's funny that enrico using "the superiority of empirical observation" as the reason why science is flawed.
It's a Twinkie Defense of junk science beliefs.
"Your honor, my client was observed ingesting a massive number of Twinkies before he killed that nice lady. Now, these "scientists" will tell you sugary packaged foods cannot cause a psychotic break, but we have a witness who empirically observed the defendant eat all these Twinkies, and well, he's never committed murder before: obviously empirical observation and my hypothesis is superior to whatever voodoo witchcraft those "scientists" do to come to their conclusions."
It's a Twinkie Defense of junk science beliefs.
"Your honor, my client was observed ingesting a massive number of Twinkies before he killed that nice lady. Now, these "scientists" will tell you sugary packaged foods cannot cause a psychotic break, but we have a witness who empirically observed the defendant eat all these Twinkies, and well, he's never committed murder before: obviously empirical observation and my hypothesis is superior to whatever voodoo witchcraft those "scientists" do to come to their conclusions."
